tg-me.com/DorrAlklame/7765
Last Update:
ربّنا✨
BY دُرر الكلام💕♪
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/FllmeKXMltC3tqqngMTOxqSsrslNanCrKD0ZlT0DPvejI6EMa0oppl8AWaFo5hPQz0JkgiEBmCbFPcdnFB9B2wsgJcU9MsfxDoHzAElH0-r6PjPm39Tr1gCrRM7W-H2TCiNs6TIvMBdnM4BegfZ6FfzcUmv_A2OcFjKognztcQ8qB0M9zOKy5UFcnNQsq2D6zyZsJrrWUvyakZWIAhZqAPY9IDa4UCHqjcHe3VuBrwgLLRtrchqtKIWi2w5IMiz0ygceT4M_cdZnJ5qu3bS0zkxbd-RmBYG_7cxxc15He-eJH0DeKRmEYVMSdiOARCfyeWRyK6t8o1D__7kpoVgdgw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/DorrAlklame/7765
ربّنا✨
BY دُرر الكلام💕♪
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
دُرر الكلام from ye